The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities and accompanying disclosures of contingent liabilities, at the reporting date. However, uncertainty about these assumptions and estimates could result in outcomes that could require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of the asset or liability affected in the future period.

The key assumptions concerning the future and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the reporting date, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year, are described below. The Company based its assumptions and estimates on parameters available when the financial statements were prepared. Existing circumstances and assumptions about future developments, however, may change due to market changes or circumstances arising that are beyond the control of the Company. Such changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur.

Useful life of property, plant and equipment

The Company’s management determines the estimated useful life of its property, plant and equipment for calculating depreciation based on the experience with similar assets. The future economic benefits embodied in the assets are consumed principally through use. However, other factors, such as technical or commercial obsolescence and wear and tear, often result in the diminution of the economic benefits embodied in the assets. Management assesses the remaining useful lives in accordance with the current technical conditions of the assets and the estimated period during which the assets are expected to earn benefits for the Company as well as the duration of lease periods. The following primary factors are considered: (a) the expected usage of the assets; (b) the expected physical wear and tear, which depends on operational factors and maintenance plan; and (c) the technical or commercial obsolescence arising from changes in market conditions.

The management periodically reviews the estimated useful lives, residual values and the depreciation method to ensure that depreciation is consistent with the expected pattern of economic benefit of the assets. The Company’s assets, classified within property, plant and equipment, are depreciated on a straight -line basis over their economic useful lives.

Provision for inventory obsolescence

The Company makes a provision for obsolete inventory items. Estimates of net realizable value of inventories are based on the most reliable evidence at the time the estimates are made. These estimates take into consideration fluctuations of price or cost directly related to events occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date to the extent that such events confirm conditions existing at the end of the year.

Employee benefit obligations

The cost of post-employment defined benefits is the present value of the related obligation, as determined using actuarial valuations. An actuarial valuation involves making various assumptions which may differ from actual developments in the future. These include the determination of the discount rate, future salary increases, withdrawal before normal retirement age, mortality rates, etc. Due to the complexity of the valuation, the underlying assumptions and its long-term nature, a defined benefit obligation is sensitive to changes in these assumptions. All assumptions are reviewed at each reporting date.

The parameter most subject to change is the discount rate. With respect to determining the appropriate discount rate, yield and duration of high-quality bonds obligation, as designated by an internationally acknowledged rating agency, are extrapolated as needed along the yield curve to correspond with the expected term of the defined benefit obligation. See Note 19 for further details.

Expected Credit Loss (ECL) measurement on financial assets

Measurement of ECL is a significant estimate that involves determination methodology, models and data inputs. The Company uses supportable forward-looking information for measurement of ECL. Details of ECL measurement methodology are disclosed in Note 32.2. The components that have a major impact on credit loss allowance are probability of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”), as well as models of macro-economic scenarios. The Company regularly reviews and validates the models and inputs of the models to reduce any differences between expected credit loss estimates and actual credit loss experience.

Decommissioning obligation

The Company’s operational activities are subject to various laws and regulations. The Company estimates decommissioning obligations based on management’s understanding of the current legal requirements in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, terms of the lease agreements and engineering estimates. A provision is made for decommissioning as soon as the obligation arises. Actual costs incurred in future years could differ materially from the amounts provided. Additionally, future changes to laws and regulations and life of assets estimates could affect the carrying amount of this provision.

Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities

In case of lease contracts where extension options are also available to the Company, judgement is applied in evaluating whether it is reasonably certain to exercise the option.

The Company reassesses whether it is reasonably certain to exercise the extension options, upon the occurrence of either a significant event or significant change in circumstances that are within the control of the Company.

Revenue recognition

The Company has agreements with Saudi Aramco to purchase feedstock for the Company’s Jeddah and Yanbu refineries and to supply certain byproducts back to Saudi Aramco after the feedstock has been processed and base oil extracted for sale to its other customers (see Note 25). The Company accounts for these transactions separately as purchases of feedstock from, and sales of byproducts to, Saudi Aramco, instead of provision of processing services. This is on the basis of the Company’s ability to control, obtaining substantial economic benefits and decision making relating to feedstock used and mix of the products produced which are substantially different from the feedstock purchased.